Concept Library
 

Wealth Concepts --
InsMark Style

by
Robert B. Ritter, Jr.
InsMark Chairman/CEO

[This report is perhaps the most comprehensive research report we have ever written. It analyses the logic behind converting equity split dollar plans to Section 7872 loan plans. If not converted to loan plans, equity split dollar plans may be continued as split dollar plans after January 1, 2004, but on later rollout (which, unless death occurs, is inevitable due to soaring economic benefit costs), the covered executive will be taxed at ordinary income rates on his/her share of the policy cash value in excess of cost basis.

The drop-dead date for conversions (January 1, 2004) provides a once-in-a-generation marketing opportunity that the majority of producers are either ignoring or overlooking.

This report shows you what to do using actual illustration data and includes a terrific pre-approach letter to attorneys and CPAs you may know who are vitally interested in this matter.]

Employer-Sponsored Split Dollar
Rescue Opportunities

Note: In this report, the term "equity split dollar" is a term used to mean any split dollar arrangement (collateral assignment or split owner) in which the executive or his/her designee, e.g., a trust, owns a share of the policy cash value in excess of his/her/its cost basis. In this report, "rollout" is a term used to mean any strategy that causes the termination of an equity split dollar arrangement with the policy continuing in force thereafter as the sole property of the executive or his/her designee, as the case may be. Examples of a rollout include a policy loan to repay the employer's interest in the plan or a bonus to the executive of the employer's interest in the plan.

Notice 2002-8 from the IRS provides (and the proposed split dollar regulations confirm) that no income tax will be due by the covered executive on his/her share of cash values at the rollout of an equity split dollar arrangement provided: 1) the arrangement was entered into prior to January 28, 2002, and 2) prior to January 1, 2004, either the rollout occurs or the plan is converted to a plan in which all employer advances (including prior advances) are funded by loans guided by the OID rules of IRC Sections 1271-1275 and the below-market rules of IRC Section 7872. There are tens of thousands of equity split dollar plans currently in effect that were issued prior to January 28, 2002.

If not converted to loan plans, equity split dollar plans may be continued as split dollar plans after January 1, 2004; however, at any subsequent rollout (which, unless death occurs, is inevitable due to soaring economic benefit costs), the covered executive will be taxed at ordinary income rates under IRC Section 83 on his/her share of the policy cash value in excess of cost basis.

The drop-dead date for conversions (January 1, 2004) provides a once-in-a-generation marketing opportunity that the majority of producers are either deliberately ignoring or are largely overlooking because they are so caught up in mourning about "what's happened to equity split dollar". Part of the reason is pure lethargy, i.e., I have a year to get to it. Part of it is lack of knowledge, i.e., I know there is a problem, but I don't know what to do about it.

For several months, we have been recommending that you discuss this issue with those who own equity split dollar plans and, most particularly, with the legal and tax advisors in your community who know where these plans exist -- yours and those of your competitors. Consider writing the following letter and two-page addendum to every such adviser you can find. (InsMark has wide distribution, and imagine your dismay after reading it if your competitors write the letter first to advisers you know.)

Your Letterhead

[Date]

[Name of Adviser]

[Name of Firm]

[Address]

[Address]

Re: In-Force Split Dollar Plans

Dear [Name of Adviser]:

IRS Notice 2002-8 virtually requires that all in-force equity split dollar plans (employer-sponsored and private versions) be converted to loan plans in accordance with IRC Section 7872. Clients who fail to do so can face massive income taxation of policy cash values in the future. You can see an example of the problem on the attached two pages.

The purpose of this letter is to let you know that I have the computer software available to illustrate the effect of a conversion of a split dollar plan to a Section 7872 plan and to illustrate brand new Section 7872 plans as well -- all in compliance with IRS Notice 2002-8 and the proposed split dollar regulations issued in July 2002.

I will give you a call in a day or so to see if you have any interest in reviewing this new material.

Sincerely yours,

[Your Name]

Page 1 of 3

 

Example of -- and Solution to -- the Problem

The data below involves an actual case of a $2,500,000 level face amount life insurance policy with five $100,000 premiums issued January 1, 2001, (issue age 43). With the equity split dollar plan, Table 1 reflects the effect over 50 years of the employer offsetting the executive's income tax on the plan's economic benefits with a gross-up bonus. With the Section 7872 equity plan resulting from conversion to a loan funded plan, Table 2 reflects the effect over 50 years (2 years of split dollar followed by 48 years of Section 7872 loans) of the employer offsetting the executive's loan interest payments with a gross-up bonus.

The issues to consider with both plans are as follows:

    • Cost to the employer
    • Recovery by the employer
    • Costs to the executive
    • Cash values owned by the executive
    • Death benefit for the executive's family
    • Tax consequence to the executive if the split dollar arrangement is terminated

Table 1
Equity Split Dollar Plan Issued at Age 43 on January 1, 2001




Yr.

(1)
Employer's
Cum. After
Tax Costs

(2)

Employer's
Receivable

(3)
Executive's
Cum. After
Tax Costs

(4)
Executive's
Share of
Cash Values

(5)
Executive's
Share of
Death Benefit

(6)
Executive's
Taxable
Income*

10

513,869

500,000

0

329,936

2,000,000

329,936

20

542,939

500,000

0

1,340,499

2,000,000

1,340,499

30

834,339

500,000

0

3,528,944

3,972,128

3,528,944

40

1,963,244

500,000

0

8,386,220

8,830,531

8,386,220

50

17,529,254

500,000

0

18,565,212

19,137,170

18,565,212

*When the arrangement is rolled out.

Table 2
Equity Split Dollar Plan Issued at Age 43 on January 1, 2001
Converted at Age 45 to a Section 7872 Equity Plan on January 1, 2003




Yr.

(1)
Employer's
Cum. After
Tax Costs

(2)

Employer's
Receivable

(3)
Executive's
Cum. After
Tax Costs

(4)
Executive's
Share of
Cash Values

(5)
Executive's
Share of
Death Benefit

(6)
Executive's
Taxable
Income

10

564,432

500,000

0

329,936

2,000,000

0

20

651,502

500,000

0

1,340,499

2,000,000

0

30

738,572

500,000

0

3,528,944

3,972,128

0

40

825,642

500,000

0

8,386,220

8,830,531

0

50

912,712

500,000

0

18,565,212

19,137,170

0

*When the arrangement is rolled out.
Cash values reflected above are illustrative only and may be higher or lower based on actual performance.

Page 2 of 3

 

More Bad News -- and Another Solution

The problem gets worse if the policy subject to split dollar is owned by an irrevocable life insurance trust and kept in force as such after January 1, 2004. In this event, the economic benefit of the plan is income to the executive and also constitutes a gift of future interest to the trust. (This result is not new in that both tax consequences have been the case with trust-owned equity split dollar plans.)

However, the new split dollar rules add another nasty consequence. When the split dollar arrangement is rolled out, the trust's share of the cash value constitutes another gift of future interest to the trust -- and the rollout must occur. Check Column 6 in Table 3 to see why the only way to control the spiraling gift consequences of the plan's economic benefit in later years is via a rollout; however, that rollout triggers the gift shown in Column 7.

Even if rolled out in year 20, for example, the deemed gifts in Column 6 ($120,824) plus the gift consequences in Column 7 ($1,340,499) add up to the unnecessary waste of ($1,461,323) the lifetime gift exemption which will ultimately result in greater estate taxes. (Using a second-to-die policy will not avoid these long-term consequence since its long-range economic benefits also spiral out of control -- particularly if one of the insureds dies and the single life economic benefit comes into play thereafter.)

Table 3
Trust-Owned Equity Split Dollar Plan Issued at Age 43 on January 1, 2001





Yr.

(1)

Employer's
Cum. After
Tax Costs

(2)


Employer's
Receivable

(3)
Trust's
Share of
Cash
Values

(4)
Trust's
Share of
Death
Benefit

(5)

Exec's
Cum. After
Tax Costs

(6)
Cum. Deemed
Gifts to Trust
of the Plan's
Econ. Benefit*

(7)
Deemed Gift
of Cash
Value to
the Trust**

10

513,869

500,000

329,936

2,000,000

0

39,024

329,936

20

542,939

500,000

1,340,499

2,000,000

0

120,824

1,340,499

30

834,339

500,000

3,528,944

3,972,128

0

438,882

3,528,944

40

1,963,244

500,000

8,386,220

8,830,531

0

4,117,359

8,386,220

50

17,529,254

500,000

18,565,212

19,137,170

0

47,917,824

18,565,212

*Gifts of future interest not covered by annual gift exclusions. **When the arrangement is rolled out.

Table 4 shows the results if the trust-owned policy is converted to a Section 7872 equity plan, i.e., one funded by loans governed by IRC Section 7872.

Table 4
Trust-Owned Equity Split Dollar Plan Issued at Age 43 on January 1, 2001
Converted at Age 45 to a Section 7872 Equity Plan on January 1, 2003





Yr.

(1)

Employer's
Cum. After
Tax Costs

(2)


Employer's
Receivable

(3)
Trust's
Share of
Cash
Values

(4)
Trust's
Share of
Death
Benefit

(5)

Exec's
Cum. After
Tax Costs

(6)
Cum. Gifts to
Trust of the
Loan Interest
Due*

(7)
Deemed Gift
of Cash
Value to
the Trust**

10

564,432

500,000

329,936

2,000,000

0

181,300

0

20

651,502

500,000

1,340,499

2,000,000

0

426,300

0

30

738,572

500,000

3,528,944

3,972,128

0

671,300

0

40

825,642

500,000

8,386,220

8,830,531

0

916,300

0

50

912,712

500,000

18,565,212

19,137,170

0

1,164,300

0

*Gifts of present interest (should be within annual gift exclusions with just one child). **When the arrangement is rolled out.
Cash values reflected above are illustrative only and may be higher or lower based on actual performance.

Page 3 of 3

Structural Differences: A trust-owned equity split dollar plan can be cast directly between the employer and the trust. The Section 7872 equity plan needs the following steps to work properly:

Step 1: The employer annually loans the executive the funds equal to policy premium and typically offsets the loan interest charges with a gross-up bonus.

Step 2: The executive, in turn, extends loans to the trust using the loan proceeds received from the employer.

Step 3: The loan documents executed between the trust and the executive are assigned by the executive to the employer as security for the loans made in Step 1.

Step 4: Using the after tax bonuses received from the employer, the executive and/or spouse gift funds to the trust for its loan interest payments and immediately receive non-taxable loan interest from the trust. (See below for a "Note Regarding Step 4".)

Step 5: The executive pays the loan interest due the employer using the loan interest received from the trust in Step 4.

Note Regarding Step 4: The trust referred to in Step 4 is a so-called "intentionally defective" grantor trust, the grantor of which is the executive or the executive's spouse. Due to grantor trust rules, there is no income tax due by the grantor on any loan interest received from the trust, i.e., the parties are a single income tax entity. (IRC Section 671 and 675, IRS Reg. 1.671-2(c) and Rev. Rul. 85-13.) Thus, when gifts to the trust provide it with the cash flow for loan interest, the gifts are returned at once as non-taxable loan interest thereby producing a cash flow neutral transaction insofar as gifts and loan interest are concerned.

It would be less complicated if a defective grantor trust with the above features could be arranged directly between the employer and the trust, but our legal and tax advisors tell us this cannot be done. (If you have advisors who believe differently, please let us know.)

Some of you may be inclined to throw up your hands at this point and say that this transaction is too complex. Please examine the differences between Tables 3 and 4 on Page 4 again. If this doesn't convince you of the extraordinary power of using Section 7872 equity plans, nothing will. The estate planning uses of equity split dollar created a gigantic market throughout the past 40 years -- but it's over! These are the new rules -- learn them or give up the market.

InsMark can help with administration, too. The InsMark Section 7872 Administration System is scheduled for release in the first quarter of 2003. It is a web-based administration system for handling all aspects of these plans, including the one with the extra steps involving trusts.

Illustrations: The illustrations for the equity split dollar plan are on Pages 10 through, and the Section 7872 equity plan appears on Pages 23 through 37 (click here to view or print both illustrations in PDF format). Using the same policy values, we assumed the equity split dollar plan (issue age 43) is converted at age 45 to a Section 7872 equity plan (what we call a Leveraged Benefit Plan). Therefore, in the accompanying illustrations, the first year values shown for the Leveraged Benefit Plan are the third year values of the policy.

You can reflect the employer's current receivable (premium advances) from an in-force equity split dollar plan being converted to a loan in the Leveraged Benefit Plan using the "Scheduled loan" selection under the System's "Premium and Loan Interest Details" tab. The System then automatically recognizes this amount as part of the initial loan that funds the Leveraged Benefit Plan. To see how we handle this, on the Summary of Costs and Benefits (Page 29), note the initial figure in Column 2 as well as the upper left footnote at the bottom of the page.

We prepared the data for this case using the stand-alone capacity of a SuperLink version of the InsMark Section 7872 Illustration SystemÔ . In the InsMark Source Data Storage File, we copied and pasted values from an age 43 proposal from years 3 through 40 into an age 45 illustration that runs for 38 years. While this procedure is effective for showing the principle of a split dollar conversion, in a real situation, you should use actual re-proposal data.

To integrate the results of re-proposal data electronically with InsMark, we need to be linked to your carrier's re-proposal system. (Don't assume we are because we are linked to your carrier's proposal system.) Until you are electronically linked to re-proposal data, you can accomplish the needed data entry through the year-by-year data entry feature of the stand-alone system. While a tedious procedure, if the purpose is to save your in-force split dollar business (or capture a competitor's), it is worthwhile.

If your carrier's re-proposal system is not linked to InsMark, we suggest you encourage them to do so. For linking details, contact David A. Grant, InsMark's Senior Vice President of Sales, at 1-888-InsMark (467-6275).

Note: One difference between the Summary pages of the two sets of attached illustrations may be confusing unless we bring it to your attention. The executive's share of policy values in the equity split dollar plan is shown net of the employer's interest in the plan. With the Leveraged Benefit Plan, we show the executive's gross policy values that collateralize the loans associated with the plan -- a change of format we deliberately made in the designs for the Leveraged Benefit Plan; however, to make the comparison easier for you, the net policy values reflected in Table 2 on Page 3 and Table 4 on Page 4 are illustrated after deducting the Section 7872 loans.

Other Issues: The IRS clearly indicated in IRS Notice 2002-8 that Section 7872 loan plans (referred to in the Notice as "Regime 2" plans) are acceptable and will be governed under the below-market rules of IRC Section 7872 and the Original Issue Discount ("OID") rules of IRC Sections 1271-1275.

Illustrations from the InsMark Section 7872 Illustration System are designed to charge loan interest at least equal to the long-term Applicable Federal Rate ("AFR"). By doing so, two major advantages occur: 1) no further loan interest is deemed to occur between the parties and 2) the OID rules become superfluous. A further advantage of charging at least the AFR is that the plan can be constructed to reflect a variety of bonus techniques that offset the executive's loan interest payments.

For illustrative purposes, the Leveraged Benefit Plan illustrations shown in this report reflect the January 2003 long-term AFR of 4.90%. In reality, the loan interest rate for each new loan will likely be different, and each future loan must bear its own AFR that is in effect during the month each new loan is executed. There are four ways to deal with an unknown future AFR:

  1. If a bonus is paid to the executive to offset the loan interest, accept the risk: This may increase or decrease the amount of the bonus; however, the loan interest paid to the employer by the executive should provide a full or partial offset, as the case may be.
  2. Accrue the additional loan interest: If the loan interest rate increases, additional loan interest could be added to the loan. Alternatively, funds could be withdrawn from the policy to make up the difference in the loan interest due.
  3. Consolidate all loans at the inception of the plan: In this case, the loaned funds in excess of those needed to pay the policy's initial premium should be reserved to pay the remaining stream of premiums as they fall due. In this case, the employer may wish to consider requiring some form of custodianship for the reserved funds to be certain they are used for the intended purpose.
  4. Renegotiate the loans: Wait until a time when the AFR dips and recast the series of promissory notes into a new note at the reduced rate.

Renegotiating is a powerful strategy, and an analysis of the historic AFR is instructive.

Table 5

High/Low AFR Rates (1992- 2001)

 

'93

'94

'95

'96

'97

'98

'99

'00

'01

'02

10 Yr. Avg.

High month

7.30%

8.23%

8.17%

7.21%

7.18%

6.13%

6.47%

6.77%

5.82%

5.85%

6.91%

Low month

5.84%

6.30%

6.36%

6.07%

6.31%

5.10%

5.21%

5.96%

5.05%

4.60%

5.68%

If, for example, a policy with five scheduled premiums had been purchased in 1993, and the loan for each premium had been made at the highest rate that occurred during each of the five years, the average loan interest rate on the composite of all five loans would end up at 7.62%, as shown in Table 6.

Table 6

 

'93

'94

'95

'96

'97

'98

'99

'00

'01

'02

1st loan:

7.30%

7.30%

7.30%

7.30%

7.30%

7.30%

7.30%

7.30%

7.30%

7.30%

2nd loan:

8.23%

8.23%

8.23%

8.23%

8.23%

8.23%

8.23%

8.23%

8.23%

3rd loan:

 

8.17%

8.17%

8.17%

8.17%

8.17%

8.17%

8.17%

8.17%

4th loan:

   

7.21%

7.21%

7.21%

7.21%

7.21%

7.21%

7.21%

5th loan:

     

7.18%

7.18%

7.18%

7.18%

7.18%

7.18%

Composite:

7.30%

7.77%

7.90%

7.73%

7.62%

7.62%

7.62%

7.62%

7.62%

7.62%

However, if each loan had been subsequently renegotiated at the lowest rate available over the years in the Table, a far different result would have been produced, as shown in Table 7.

Table 7

 

'93

'94

'95

'96

'97

'98

'99

'00

'01

'02

1st loan:

7.30%

6.30%

6.30%

6.07%

6.07%

5.10%

5.10%

5.10%

5.05%

4.60%

2nd loan:

8.23%

6.36%

6.07%

6.07%

5.10%

5.10%

5.10%

5.05%

4.60%

3rd loan:

 

8.17%

6.07%

6.07%

5.10%

5.10%

5.10%

5.05%

4.60%

4th loan:

   

7.21%

6.31%

5.10%

5.10%

5.10%

5.05%

4.60%

5th loan:

     

7.18%

5.10%

5.10%

5.10%

5.05%

4.60%

Composite:

7.30%

7.27%

6.94%

6.36%

6.34%

5.10%

5.10%

5.10%

5.05%

4.60%

This example (which may not be representative of interest rates over all durations) reduces the long-range loan interest rate on a regular basis. By the tenth year (2002), it would have been permanently reduced from 7.30% to 4.60%, a 40% reduction -- significant indeed for a series of loans scheduled to stay in force over many years. Any future dips in the AFR below 4.60% could lower it further, and future spikes would not affect it.

We allow users of the InsMark Section 7872 Illustration System to reflect loan interest rates equal to or greater than the current AFR in order to provide a comfort zone in the initial illustration for those clients concerned that the AFR might spike over the premium paying years. The strategy illustrated in Table 7 should be kept in mind when deciding on an illustrative loan interest rate for a Section 7872 equity plan.

A final thought on loan interest renegotiations: Many homeowners have refinanced their home mortgage interest rates downward over the last several years -- in some cases, more than once. There have been dozens of opportunities to do so as rates fell; however, the decision to act was controlled to a great extent by 1) the hassle and 2) the costs associated with refinancing, e.g., appraisal fees, points, etc. Imagine if there had been no hassle and no costs -- just a simple form to sign. Under these circumstances, imagine how many times the refinancing would have taken place. Renegotiating the loan interest rates on the loans that support a Section 7872 equity plan is just that simple. How do clients keep track of the rates? If your client elects to have his/her plan administered by the web-based InsMark Section 7872 Administration System, a monthly e-mail is sent outlining each month's new rate and whether any in-force loans are at higher rates.

In Case You Were Wondering: Table 8 shows the effect of the Section 7872 equity plan discussed in this report at different non-renegotiated AFRs. (4.90% is the AFR reflected in the Tables 2 and 4.)

Table 8
Summary of Costs and Benefits at
Various Level Long-Term Applicable Federal Rates

(1)

Long-Term
Applicable
Federal
Rate

(2)
Employer's
Cumulative
Funding
Costs Over
50 Years

(3)
Executive's
(or Trust's)
Illustrated
Cash Values
Year 50

(4)
Executive's
(or Trust's)
Illustrated
Death Benefit
Year 50

4.90%

912,712

18,565,212

19,137,170

5.00%

921,149

18,565,212

19,137,170

6.00%

1,005,478

18,565,212

19,137,170

7.50%

1,131,700

18,565,212

19,137,170

10.00%

1,342,251

18,565,212

19,137,170

Illustrated cash values are not guaranteed and may be higher or lower than illustrated.

Since the introduction of the rules regarding loans governed by Section 7872, the AFR for long-term loans has exceeded 10% only three times (April 1985 -- 10.37%; May 1985 -- 10.36%; and January 1986 -- 10.13%). Even at interest rates well above current rate levels, you can see from Table 8 that a Section 7872 equity plan offers irresistible results to covered executives compared to keeping an equity split dollar plan in effect. How many corporate owners would be willing to run the relatively minor risk associated with Column 2 in Table 8 in order to have the potential to build the cash value account and family death benefit shown in Columns 3 and 4? We think that a great many would!

Timing of Rollouts for Section 7872 Equity Plans: The Section 7872 equity plan in this report is illustrated to remain in force past retirement and is assumed to cover sole or majority shareholders of closely-held corporations (although it could be rolled out earlier -- probably via a policy loan used to repay the loan to the employer). Plans provided to key executive non-shareholders will likely be undone earlier, e.g., rolled out at retirement.

Specimen Documents: Licensees for the InsMark Section 7872 Illustration System are furnished with a several specimen documents used to establish the loan transactions.

New Plans: Don't overlook the use of Section 7872 equity plans for new cases. Due to the new rules affecting split dollar, traditional equity split dollar sales have understandably fallen off a cliff. The need for equity-type split benefit plans has not gone away, just the traditional funding mechanism. Those who jump on the new loan approach will supercharge their practice.

Licensing: The InsMark Section 7872 Illustration System is available for licensing now. Please call an InsMark Account Executive at 1-888-InsMark (467-6275) (or click here) for details. Insurance companies and other institutional firms interested in multiple unit or site licensing should contact David A. Grant, Senior Vice President, Sales, at 1-925-543-0500.

Workbooks: Licensees for the InsMark Illustration System can review all reports and related menu inputs for the accompanying equity split dollar plan illustrations by selecting the Workbook named MA146.!II from this website.

Licensees for the InsMark Section 7872 Illustration System can review all reports and related menu inputs for the accompanying Section 7872 equity plan (Leveraged Benefit Plan) illustrations by selecting the Workbook named MA146.!LB from this website.

To go to the Workbook download page on our website, click on Producer's Center; then on Workbook Download (one of the icons at the top of the page). After you download the Workbook files, you can import them into their respective Systems by clicking on Client Workbook / Import Workbook on the main menu bar. To download now, click here.

Important Notice: In all cases, the approval of a client's legal and tax counsel must be secured before implementing a Section 7872 equity plan.

P.S. Now is the time to write the letter to legal and tax advisers shown on Pages 2, 3, and 4. Your competition will be well ahead of you if you wait until next fall! We have over 1,000 of our licensees writing this letter -- some of them undoubtedly to advisers in your backyard.

[Rev.3-10-03]

  Power Producers | Registry | Product Center | Seminars | Concept Library | Workbook Download | Technical Support | Training Center  
Search: Advanced Search   
White on Red Small Logo InsMark, Inc.
2400 Camino Ramon, Suite 150
San Ramon, CA 94583

InsMark Order Line: 888-InsMark (467-6275)
Main Office: 925-543-0500 | Fax: 925-543-0501
Customer Service: 925-543-0507
E-mail: info@insmark.com

© Copyright 2003-2008, InsMark, Inc. All Rights Reserved